Monday 31 August 2020

Installation of protection relays

 Commissioning tests of protection relays at site (before set to work)

Installation of protection relays

Installation of protection relays at site creates a number of possibilities for errors in the implementation of the scheme to occur. Even if the scheme has been thoroughly tested in the factory, wiring to the CTs and VTs on site may be incorrectly carried out, or the CTs/VTs may have been incorrectly installed.

The impact of such errors may range from simply being a nuisance (tripping occurs repeatedly on energisation, requiring investigation to locate and correct the errors) through to failure to trip under fault conditions, leading to major equipment damage, disruption to supplies and potential hazards to personnel.

The strategies available to remove these risks are many, but all involve some kind of testing at site. Commissioning tests at site are therefore invariably performed before protection equipment is set to work. The aims of commissioning tests are:

  1. To ensure that the equipment has not been damaged during transit or installation
  2. To ensure that the installation work has been carried out correctly
  3. To prove the correct functioning of the protection scheme as a whole

The tests carried out will normally vary according to the protection scheme involved, the relay technology used, and the policy of the client. In many cases, the tests actually conducted are determined at the time of commissioning by mutual agreement between the client’s representative and the commissioning team.

The following tests are invariably carried out, since the protection scheme will not function correctly if faults exist.

  • Wiring diagram check, using circuit diagrams showing all the reference numbers of the interconnecting wiring
  • General inspection of the equipment, checking all connections, wires on relays terminals, labels on terminal boards, etc.
  • Insulation resistance measurement of all circuits 
  • Perform relay self-test procedure and external communications checks on digital/numerical relays 
  • Test main current transformers
  • Test main voltage transformers
  • Check that protection relay alarm/trip settings have been entered correctly 
  • Tripping and alarm circuit checks to prove correct functioning
In addition, the following checks may be carried out, depending on the factors noted above (not covered in this technical article):

  • Secondary injection test on each relay to prove operation at one or more setting values
  • Primary injection tests on each relay to prove stability for external faults and to determine the effective current setting for internal faults (essential for some types of electromechanical relays)
  • Testing of protection scheme logic

Insulation resistance tests

All the deliberate earth connections on the wiring to be tested should first be removed, for example earthing links on current transformers, voltage transformers and DC supplies. Some insulation testers generate impulses with peak voltages exceeding 5kV. In these instances any electronic equipment should be disconnected while the external wiring insulation is checked.

The insulation resistance should be measured to earth and between electrically separate circuits. The readings are recorded and compared with subsequent routine tests to check for any deterioration of the insulation.

The insulation resistance measured depends on the amount of wiring involved, its grade, and the site humidity. Generally, if the test is restricted to one cubicle, a reading of several hundred megohms should be obtained. If long lengths of site wiring are involved, the reading could be only a few megohms.

Protection relay self-test procedure

Digital and numerical relays will have a self-test procedure that is detailed in the appropriate relay manual. These tests should be followed to determine if the relay is operating correctly.

This will normally involve checking of the relay watchdog circuit, exercising all digital inputs and outputs and checking that the relay analogue inputs are within calibration by applying a test current or voltage.

For these tests, the relay outputs are normally disconnected from the remainder of the protection scheme, as it is a test carried out to prove correct relay, rather than scheme, operation.

To shorten testing and commissioning times of SIPROTEC relays, extensive test and diagnostic functions are available to the user in DIGSI 5

To shorten testing and commissioning times of SIPROTEC relays, extensive test and diagnostic functions are available to the user in DIGSI 5

Unit protection schemes involve relays that need to communicate with each other. This leads to additional testing requirements. The communications path between the relays is tested using suitable equipment to ensure that the path is complete and that the received signal strength is within specification. Numerical relays may be fitted with loopback test facilities that enable either part of or the entire communications link to be tested from one end.

After completion of these tests, it is usual to enter the relay settings required. This can be done manually via the relay front panel controls, or using a portable PC and suitable software.

Whichever, method is used, a check by a second person that the correct settings have been used is desirable, and the settings recorded. Programmable scheme logic that is required is also entered at this stage.

SIPROTEC relay wiring test editor for monitoring and testing of binary inputs, binary outputs and LED

SIPROTEC relay wiring test editor for monitoring and testing of binary inputs, binary outputs and LED (click to expand)

Current transformer tests

The following tests are normally carried out prior to energisation of the main circuits: checking of polarity and current transformer magnetisation curve.


Polarity check

Each current transformer should be individually tested to verify that the primary and secondary polarity markings are correct (see Figure 1).

The ammeter connected to the secondary of the current transformer should be a robust moving coil, permanent magnet, centre-zero type. A low voltage battery is used, via a single-pole push-button switch, to energise the primary winding. On closing the push-button, the DC ammeter, A, should give a positive flick and on opening, a negative flick.

Current transformer polarity check
Figure 1 – Current transformer polarity check


Checking of magnetisation curve

Several points should be checked on each current transformer magnetisation curve. This can be done by energising the secondary winding from the local mains supply through a variable auto-transformer while the primary circuit remains open. See Figure 2.

The characteristic is measured at suitable intervals of applied voltage, until the magnetising current is seen to rise very rapidly for a small increase in voltage. This indicates the approximate knee-point or saturation flux level of the current transformer.

The magnetising current should then be recorded at similar voltage intervals as it is reduced to zero.

Testing current transformer magnetising curve
Figure 2 – Testing current transformer magnetising curve

Care must be taken that the test equipment is suitably rated. The short-time current rating must be in excess of the CT secondary current rating, to allow for measurement of the saturation current. This will be in excess of the CT secondary current rating. As the magnetising current will not be sinusoidal, a moving iron or dynamometer type ammeter should be used.

It is often found that current transformers with secondary ratings of 1A or less have a knee-point voltage higher than the local mains supply. In these cases, a step-up interposing transformer must be used to obtain the necessary voltage to check the magnetisation curve.

Voltage transformer tests

Voltage transformers require testing for polarity, ratio and phasing.


Polarity check of voltage transformer

The voltage transformer polarity can be checked using the method for CT polarity tests. Care must be taken to connect the battery supply to the primary winding, with the polarity ammeter connected to the secondary winding. If the voltage transformer is of the capacitor type, then the polarity of the transformer at the bottom of the capacitor stack should be checked.

Ratio check of VT

This check can be carried out when the main circuit is first made live. The voltage transformer secondary voltage is compared with the secondary voltage shown on the nameplate.

Namplate of a single phase voltage transformer
Namplate of a single phase voltage transformer (photo credit: emadrlc.blogspot.com)


Phasing check of VT

The secondary connections for a three-phase voltage transformer or a bank of three single-phase voltage transformers must be carefully checked for phasing. With the main circuit alive, the phase rotation is checked using a phase rotation meter connected across the three phases, as shown in Figure 3 below.

Provided an existing proven VT is available on the same primary system, and that secondary earthing is employed, all that is now necessary to prove correct phasing is a voltage check between, say, both ‘A’ phase secondary outputs. There should be nominally little or no voltage if the phasing is correct.

However, this test does not detect if the phase sequence is correct, but the phases are displaced by 120o from their correct position, i.e. phase A occupies the position of phase C or phase B in Figure 3.

This can be checked by removing the fuses from phases B and C (say) and measuring the phase-earth voltages on the secondary of the VT. If the phasing is correct, only phase A should be healthy, phases B and C should have only a small residual voltage.

Voltage transformer phasing check
Figure 3 – Voltage transformer phasing check

Correct phasing should be further substantiated when carrying out ‘on load’ tests on any phase-angle sensitive relays, at the relay terminals. Load current in a known phase CT secondary should be compared with the associated phase to neutral VT secondary voltage.

The phase angle between them should be measured, and should relate to the power factor of the system load.

If the three-phase voltage transformer has a broken-delta tertiary winding, then a check should be made of the voltage across the two connections from the broken delta VN and VL, as shown in Figure 3 above. With the rated balanced three- phase supply voltage applied to the voltage transformer primary windings, the broken-delta voltage should be below 5V with the rated burden connected.

Protection relay setting checks (alarm and trip settings)

At some point during commissioning, the alarm and trip settings of the relay elements involved will require to be entered and/or checked. Where the complete scheme is engineered and supplied by a single contractor, the settings may already have been entered prior to despatch from the factory, and hence this need not be repeated.

The method of entering settings varies according to the relay technology used. For electromechanical and static relays, manual entry of the settings for each relay element is required. This method can also be used for digital/numerical relays.

However, the amount of data to be entered is much greater, and therefore it is usual to use appropriate software, normally supplied by the manufacturer, for this purpose. The software also makes the essential task of making a record of the data entered much easier.

Once the data has been entered, it should be checked for compliance with the recommended settings as calculated from the protection setting study. Where appropriate software is used for data entry, the checks can be considered complete if the data is checked prior to download of the settings to the relay.

Otherwise, a check may required subsequent to data entry by inspection and recording of the relay settings, or it may be considered adequate to do this at the time of data entry. The recorded settings form an essential part of the commissioning documentation provided to the client.

Resource // Network protection and automation guide – Areva 

Friday 28 August 2020

767 Teachers Jobs and Civil Services in Zabul (IARCSC) Jobs in Afghanistan

  767 Teachers Jobs and Civil Services in Zabul (IARCSC) Jobs in Afghanistan

Independent Administrative Reform Civil Service Commission (IARCSC) of Afghanistan announced vacancies at 13 provinces as Teachers and Civil Services in Rank of 4 and 5. this job opportunity is only for Zabul province. If you want to visit other provinces you can also click here.

Details | Job in Afghanistan

  • Opportunity type: Salary Based
  • Opportunity: Job
  • Salary: 
  • No of opportunity: 767
  • Organization: Independent Administrative Reform Civil Service Commission (IARCSC)
  • Location: Zabul
  • Position title: Teachers and Civil Services
  • Gender: Male and Female
  • Deadline: 10. Sept. 2020
  • How to Apply

    • Please read the instructions for the various vacancies of the group exams carefully before applying for the jobs. Enter the exact title of the post, ministry, department, position of the post in the application form. You only have the right to apply for one position and in case of multiple requests, you will be excluded from the competition process.
    • After filling in the application form, attach your photo to the application form and submit it to the relevant authorities from Sunday (August 29) to Thursday (September  10), along with a copy of your ID and educational documents.
    • Application form for Teacher jobs
    • Application form for Civil Services


Tuesday 25 August 2020

Photovoltaic (PV) installation

 Photovoltaic (PV) installation

In order to understand a photovoltaic (PV) installation and its components we must be familiar with the following terms:

  1. Standard Test Conditions (STC)
  2. PV modules
  3. PV string and Array

1. Standard Test Conditions (STC)

The output of a PV module is not stable it depends on irradiation, temperature etc., thus, we need fixed conditions in order to compare them, size and design our installation. These conditions are called as standard test conditions (STC):

a) Incident irradiance on the PV module surface: 1000W/m²

The 4 curve of a PV module proportionally to irradiance
Figure 1 – The 4 curve of a PV module proportionally to irradiance

We consider that the output power of the module is the point of the IV curve which shapes the greatest area. As we can see the irradiance influences mostly the current.


b) Cell temperature: 25°C

The output of a PV module proportionally to cell temperature
Figure 2 – The output of a PV module proportionally to cell temperature

We consider that the output power of the modules is the point of the IV curve which shapes the greatest area. As we notice the output voltage of a PV module depends mostly on its temperature.


c) Air Mass: 1.5

The Air Mass is the path length which light takes through the atmosphere normalized to the shortest possible path length (that is, when the sun is directly overhead AM=1).

The Air Mass quantifies the reduction in the power of light as it passes through the atmosphere and is absorbed by air and dust.

The Air Mass is defined as:

AM = 1 / cos(Θ)

Air Mass 1.5
Figure 4 – Air Mass 1.5

2. PV Modules

All the datasheets include their electrical characteristics data in STC. For instance:

El. characteristicsUnitValue
 Nominal output (Pmpp)W280
 Voltage at Pmax (Vmpp)V36.5
 Current at Pmax (Impp)A7.7
 Open circuit voltage (Voc)

3. String and Array PV Modules

Is a series electrical connectivity of PV modules. An example of string is the following:

A string consist of 18 PV modules
Figure 5 – A string consist of 18 PV modules

Assuming that our PV module’s output at STC is: Imp 7A, Vmp 30V, 210W If we will measure at points 1 and 2 we will find: 7A and 540V (18 PV modules X30V) and we get 3,78kW

An example of Array (parallel strings)

Two parallel strings each one consists of 18 PV modules
Figure 6 – Two parallel strings each one consists of 18 PV modules

If we will measure at points 3 and 4 we will find: 14A and 540V (18 PV modules X30V) and we get 7,56kW.

V44.5

Monday 24 August 2020

Low Voltage Ride through Hybrid Energy System (Solar, Wind)

Low Voltage Ride through Hybrid Energy System

Researches in 2017 showed that, by 2020, around 20% of the total energy production worldwide will be generated from renewable energy. The share of renewables in global electricity generation jumped to nearly 28% in Q1 2020 from 26% in Q1 2019. The increase in renewables came mainly at the cost of coal and gas, though those two sources still represent close to 60% of global electricity supply. But the major problem with the standalone system is that the sources are not continuous.

This intermittent nature of the sources can tamper the power system stability.

Hence we can combine two or more such renewable energy sources to form a hybrid renewable energy system. Such hybrid systems are more promising and effective in generating power, especially in remote areas, as compared to individual systems.

They could bring out the advantages of each renewable source being combined and also complement the demands of conventional power systems. There are so many renewable energy sources available, but Wind and solar power projects are widely getting implemented that they are of free access and environment – friendly.

But for the connection of new generation systems into our existing grids, the transmission system operators define minimum requirements that should be met, which is called Grid Code.

The major challenge with a grid connected hybrid system is that they must contribute with the power quality and power system stability. During a fault at the grid side, it’s the voltage at the point of common coupling (PCC) which drops suddenly. This will adversely affects the entire hybrid system as the drop in voltage abruptly increases the rotor speed of the wind energy conversion system (WECS) generator and also affects the normal operation of the PV system.

Thus, in order to protect the renewable systems, it was customary practice to disconnect the renewable systems upon faulty grid conditions.

But, nowadays, due to higher penetration of renewable systems into the grid, disconnection of such a large number of renewable systems instantly from the grid during fault can aggravate the power system stability issues.

Because removal of such large scale hybrid generation during voltage dip will further cause the voltage to go down, which in turn results in the disconnection of more generation units, leading to a cascading failure.

Figure 1 – Result of a voltage drop test at a PV system. In this diagram the voltage drops to about 20% of the nom­inal voltage for a time of approx. 550ms. The PV inverter recognizes the voltage drop and feeds a reactive current of approx. 100% of the nominal voltage into the system for the duration of the fault in order to support the grid. After fault clearance the active power output is increased to the value prior to the occurrence of the fault within 160ms. (credit: J. Dirksen; DEWI GmbH, Wilhelmshaven)

IEEE 1547a

Therefore, came a renewed grid code, IEEE 1547a standard in 2014, which is referred to as Amendment 1 to IEEE 1547 standard in 2003, demanding that these new large scale generation plants should possess Low Voltage Ride Through (LVRT) capability.

As per this Amendment 1, there will be coordination between the grid operators and those of the renewable systems, on how these renewable systems can regulate the voltage by changes to real and reactive power.

It aims at maintaining sustainable power delivery during the faulty conditions and instead of getting disconnected from the grid, the generation units should ride through the low voltage conditions and support the grid. This will provide a much robust grid, as the Distributed Energy Resource (DER) is clearly allowed to provide low voltage ride through.

By providing appropriate control to the DER systems, we could make the system ride through the voltage dip condition by injecting reactive current at the point of common coupling PCC, and thereby improving the voltage that has fallen due to fault. But this method involves inclusion of some complex control circuitry.

Hence, among the various solutions to accomplish LVRT capability, the better choice is to employ FACTS (Flexible AC Transmission Systems) devices.

Grid connected PV-Wind Hybrid system integrated with FACTS-ESS
Figure 1 – Grid connected PV-Wind Hybrid system integrated with FACTS-ESS

FACTS technologies provide advanced solutions as, Unified Power Flow Controller (UPFC) – like FACTS devices can provide independent and simultaneous control of both real and reactive power flow. Due to instantaneous reactive power injection, steady state is reached faster. During the time of large transients, the DC link storage of the FACTS device may not be sufficient as it is limited to a definite value.

So, a backup energy storage system (ESS) like Super Capacitor can be coupled to the device’s DC link to improve the dynamic performance of power systems. Integrating an ESS into a FACTS device can lead to improved controller flexibility by providing dynamic decentralized active power capabilities.

Thus, the enhanced performance of the combined FACTS/ESS will have greater appeal to transmission service providers, when it comes to the case of achieving LVRT capability in Grid connected hybrid systems.

Sunday 23 August 2020

Afghanistan Electricity and Rivers (Kunar River)

Afghanistan Electricity and Rivers

Afghanistan is a major country in the central Asian region and its ability to become a bridge between south and central Asia is critical to any form of development and inter-regional collaboration particularly in the energy sector. History has not been kind to Afghanistan and it is a less developed country with poor governance and weak institutions. However, today there are opportunities to overcome the legacy of the past and seizure the vicious circle of economic regressions and political violence into enhanced political stability and economic development.

Afghanistan has sufficient energy resources to provide reliable electricity to its people and industries. Based on MEW estimates it has about 318 GW of renewable energy production capacity. Along with renewable there are significant hydrocarbons and coal resources. But despite the possession of these resources the country has remained underdeveloped with a low electrification rate of only around 30–38%. The deteriorating security conditions remain the main impediment to all the development incentives including the energy sector. The energy sector has technical, financial and institutional constraints. In addition, the trans-boundary water management issue remains a key obstacle for hydro-power potential utilization.

The Afghan people has started a campaign requesting the government to build a hydroelectric power plant on the river as it has the potential of hydro-energy where men and woman are willing voluntarily to provide some amount from their salaries or selling there golds necklaces and rings. 

                                                             The Kunar River

by: eee-af

AC 12V-0-12V transformer